The Standardisation of Time Zones

IELTS Reading Practice

medium

20:00

Reading Passage

Today we take for granted that the time shown on a clock in one city bears a fixed and predictable relationship to the time in another. Yet for most of human history there was no such system. Each town simply set its clocks by the sun, so that noon was the moment the sun stood highest in the local sky. Because the sun reaches this point at slightly different moments as one travels east or west, neighbouring towns kept times that differed by a few minutes, and no one regarded this as a problem.

This patchwork of local times worked well enough as long as travel and communication were slow. A traveller journeying by horse or on foot moved so gradually that the small differences between one town and the next were of no consequence. The situation began to change dramatically with the coming of the railway. Trains could carry people across long distances at speeds that had never before been possible, and suddenly the multitude of local times became a serious source of confusion.

The difficulty was especially acute for the railway companies themselves, which needed to publish timetables and to run trains safely on shared tracks. If every station along a line kept its own slightly different time, drawing up a coherent schedule became a nightmare, and the risk of collisions was real. In response, railway operators began to adopt a single standard time along their lines, regardless of the varying local times of the towns they served. In Britain, this railway time gradually spread until it was accepted across the whole country.

In larger nations the problem was greater still, because the distances involved meant that the difference between local times in the east and the west could amount to hours rather than minutes. The many separate railway companies operating across such territories used a bewildering variety of time standards, and a single journey might cross several of them. Passengers and station staff struggled to make sense of the resulting confusion, and pressure grew for a more rational arrangement.

The solution that eventually emerged was to divide the world into a series of broad zones, within each of which the same standard time would be kept. These zones were conceived as bands running roughly north to south, spaced so that the time changed by one hour from one zone to the next. This meant that clocks within a zone would no longer show the exact local solar time everywhere, but the small discrepancy was a price worth paying for the enormous convenience of a shared, predictable system.

A crucial requirement for any such system was an agreed starting point from which the zones could be measured. In the 1880s an international conference was held to address this and related questions. After much discussion, the delegates agreed to adopt the meridian passing through the observatory at Greenwich, near London, as the prime meridian, the line of zero longitude from which the zones would be counted. Not every country accepted the decision immediately, and some continued to use their own arrangements for years afterwards, but over time the Greenwich-based system became the international standard.

The adoption of standard time zones did not please everyone. Some people objected that clocks would no longer tell the 'true' time given by the sun, and there was a lingering attachment to the old local times in various places. Yet the practical advantages were overwhelming. As telegraph lines, railways and later other forms of communication tied distant regions ever more closely together, the ability to coordinate activities across great distances became indispensable, and this depended on everyone agreeing what time it was.

The system of time zones we use today is the direct descendant of these nineteenth-century reforms. Later refinements, including the adjustment of zone boundaries to follow political frontiers and the introduction of seasonal clock changes in many countries, have added complications, but the underlying principle remains the same. A message sent by telegraph could cross a continent in moments, and without a shared framework of time the senders and receivers could not easily agree when it had been dispatched or when a reply might be expected. What began as a practical response to the confusion caused by the railways has become one of the invisible frameworks that make modern global life possible, a shared grid of time laid across the whole surface of the planet.

Questions

Questions 1–6

Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage? Write TRUE, FALSE or NOT GIVEN.

1
For most of history, towns set their clocks according to the position of the sun.
2
The differences between local times caused serious problems for travellers on foot or on horseback.
3
Railway companies needed a standard time in order to publish timetables and run trains safely.
4
Every country accepted the Greenwich meridian as soon as the conference had agreed on it.
5
The introduction of standard time zones was welcomed by absolutely everyone.
6
The first railway to adopt a standard time was located in Britain.
Question 7

Question 7: Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

7
What invention mainly created the need for standard time?
Question 8

Question 8: Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

8
How were the time zones conceived?
Question 9

Question 9: Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

9
What did the international conference of the 1880s decide to adopt?
Question 10

Question 10: Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

10
Why did the practical advantages of standard time outweigh the objections?
Questions 11–14

Answer the questions below. Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer.

11
By how much does the time change from one zone to the next?(max 2 words)
12
Near which city is the observatory whose meridian was chosen as zero longitude?(max 2 words)
13
What is the line of zero longitude called?(max 3 words)
14
What seasonal practice, introduced in many countries, has added complications to the system?(max 3 words)
0 / 14 answered